According to @iampaulgrewal, he testified before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee and stated that digital assets were the target of Operation Choke Point 2.0 (source: @iampaulgrewal on X, Dec 1, 2025). He warned that any legal American industry could be next if regulators continue to use banking services as a political weapon (source: @iampaulgrewal on X, Dec 1, 2025). He also thanked the Committee for documenting these abuses so they do not recur (source: @iampaulgrewal on X, Dec 1, 2025). For traders, the testimony centers on access to banking services for crypto firms that support fiat on/off ramps and exchange operations, highlighting policy risk tied to banking relationships (source: @iampaulgrewal on X, Dec 1, 2025).

According to @EleanorTerrett, a crypto CEO has been debanked and she has reached out to JPMorgan for comment. Source: @EleanorTerrett. Senator Cynthia Lummis separately highlighted a vow to crack down on orchestrators of Operation Choke Point 2.0, providing regulatory context to the debanking claim. Source: Senator Cynthia Lummis. For traders, the reported account closure elevates near-term counterparty and fiat on-ramp risk for crypto firms and increases headline sensitivity until the banking relationship details are clarified. Source: @EleanorTerrett and Senator Cynthia Lummis.

According to nic carter, Operation Choke Point 2.0 has been mentioned, potentially signaling increased regulatory scrutiny on cryptocurrency transactions and banking relationships. This could impact liquidity and access to banking services for crypto businesses, as seen in previous regulatory crackdowns.

According to Stephen Gustin, Operation Choke Point 2.0 is still affecting the cryptocurrency trading environment, despite the cessation of the initial phases targeting customer de-banking and banking institutions like Silvergate and Signature. This ongoing regulatory pressure may influence trading liquidity and market access, as financial institutions continue to face scrutiny.